However, the implementation of tress effects in PES 17 is rather remarkable and is eerily close to the real thing.Īnother area where PES 17 takes the lead is the ultra realistic replays. The skin tone of players also look quite realistic in FIFA 17 with high quality skin shaders and honestly, it looks head and shoulders above the ones found in PES 17. FIFA 17’s lighting looks richer and pops out more compared to the slightly dull look of PES 17. So yes, there are quite a number of differences between the two titles and it’s interesting to note that the implementation of lighting is quite different in each of them.

Both engines run their respective games at 60 frames per second, which to be honest is expected in sports games. On the other hand, PES 17 runs on the FOX engine, a set of tools and framework known for realistic lighting and fluid gameplay. The engine is known for breathtaking physical based lighting, realistic skin tones and enhanced animations. So this brings us to the overarching question among fans…which game looks better?įIFA 17 marks the first entry in the long running franchise to use the Frostbite engine. FIFA 17 really amped up the experience by offering a full fledged campaign taking you through the life of upcoming football star Alex Hunter and on other hand PES 17 bought in several improvements in the on-field mechanics such as better attacking and defense options. Both FIFA 17 and Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 have been critically praised for their respective gameplay improvements and it’s almost shocking that there are two really great titles and more variety and options for consumers this time around. 2016 is a fantastic year for football fans.

Fifa 2017 pes 4